THE HUBBLE LAW

Warning: This Computer Laboratory exercise requires a Javascript and frames capable browser.

Total Available Marks: 60.
 Edwin P. Hubble (1889-1953) observes with the Schmidt telescope on Mount Palomar, California.
Edwin Hubble piccie    
         
     

I. INTRODUCTION

One of the most interesting things about the universe is that virtually all the galaxies in it (with the exception of a few nearby ones) are moving away from the Milky Way. [Galaxies are gigantic groups of thousands of millions of stars, the Milky Way is the galaxy in which we live.] This curious fact was first discovered in the early 20th century by astronomer Vesto Slipher, who noted that the light from most galaxies was redder than expected. This so-called redshift was interpreted as the effect of the galaxy moving away from us resulting in a Doppler shift of its light. [Doppler shift also occurs with sound - you must have noticed that the note of a car engine sound is initially high at it approaches you then abruptly becomes lower as it passes by and starts to move away.]

In the 1920's, Edwin Hubble measured the distances of the galaxies for the first time, and when he plotted these distances against the speed at which each galaxy was moving away he noted something strange: The further a galaxy was from the Milky Way, the faster it was moving away. Was there something special about our place in the universe that made us a centre of cosmic repulsion?

Astrophysicists readily interpreted Hubble's relation as evidence of a universal expansion. The distance between all galaxies in the universe was getting bigger with time, like the distance between currants in a rising fruit cake. An observer on ANY galaxy, not just our own, would see all the other galaxies travelling away, with the furthest galaxies travelling the fastest.

This was a remarkable discovery. The expansion is believed today to be a result of a "Big Bang" which occurred between 10 and 20 billion years ago, a date which we can calculate by making measurements like those of Hubble. The rate of expansion of the universe tells us how long it has been expanding. We determine the rate by plotting the velocities of galaxies against their distances, and determining the slope of the graph, a number called the Hubble constant, Ho ("H-nought"), which tells us how fast a galaxy at a given distance is receding from us. So Hubble's discovery of the correlation between velocity and distance is fundamental in understanding the evolution of the universe.

Using modern techniques, we will repeat Hubble's experiment. The technique we will use is fundamental to cosmological research these days. Even though Hubble's first measurements were made three-quarters of a century ago, we have still only measured the velocities and distances of a small fraction of the galaxies we can see, and so we have only a small amount of data on whether the rate of expansion is the same in all places and in all directions in the universe. The redshift-distance relation thus continues to help us map the universe in space and time.
 

Hubbles's Law

Hubble's Law states that the recessional velocity of a galaxy is proportional to its distance from us; the equation looks like this:

  v = Ho * d,

where v is the galaxy's velocity (in km/sec), d is the distance to the galaxy (in megaparsecs; 1 Mpc = 1 million parsecs = 3 million light years), and Ho is the proportionality constant, called "The Hubble constant". This equation is telling us that a galaxy moving away from us twice as fast as another galaxy will be twice as far away.

The velocity is relatively easy for us to measure using the Doppler effect. An object in motion will have its radiation (i.e. light) shifted in wavelength according to the following formula:

,

 Wavelengths are usually measured in Angstroms (Å). The speed of light has a constant value of 300,000 km/sec. The quantity on the left side of the equation above is usually called the redshift, and is denoted by the letter z. [Note this is the non-relativistic form of the Doppler formula which is only true for cases where v/c is much less than 1.]

 So, we can determine the velocity of a galaxy from its spectrum: we simply measure the wavelength shift of a known absorption line and solve for v. [Absorption lines are sharp dips in the light coming from an object. They occur at particular wavelengths depending on which element is absorbing the light.] Example:

A certain absorption line that is found at 5000Å in the lab is found at 5050Å when analyzing the spectrum of a particular galaxy. We then conclude that this galaxy is moving with a velocity v = (50/5000) * c = 3000 km/sec away from us.
A trickier task is to determine a galaxy's distance, since we must rely on more indirect methods. One may assume, for instance, that all galaxies are the same physical size, no matter where they are. This is known as "a standard ruler" or "standard yardstick" assumption. To determine the distance to a galaxy one would only need to measure its apparent (angular) size, and use the following approximation for small angles: a = s / d,

where a is the measured angular size (in radians!), s is the galaxy's true size (diameter), and d is the distance to the galaxy (where s and d are both measured in the same length units]. Hence if galaxies were all intrinsically the same size then the farther away they were the smaller they would appear and we could use their apparent size to estimate their distance.
 


II. MEASUREMENTS

It is very important that when measuring the sizes of the galaxies you ensure that your browser window is maximised.

For 12 of the 27 galaxies in the sample provided you are to make two measurements [choose any 12 you prefer]:

You may wish to include a comment in the appropriate column on your table of results for cases where you think the measurements were hard to make perhaps because the lines were hard to identify in the spectrum or because the galaxy image was faint etc.

III. CALCULATIONS

Now we can use these data to determine the value of the Hubble constant and estimate the age of the Universe.

Hubble's Law predicts that the galaxies should lie on a straight line when plotted on a graph of distance vs. velocity. Make a graph like this (please use graph paper or a computer plotting package), with distance on the x-axis in units of Mpc, and velocity on the y-axis in km/s. Draw a straight line using a ruler that best fits the points on the graph; remember that this line must pass through the origin of coordinates i.e. the point (0,0) at the bottom left of your graph. Can you explain why?

  1. Measure the gradient of your best-fit line (vertical change / horizontal change) - this is the value of the Hubble constant, in the funny units of km/sec/Mpc.
  2. Your data points probably do not lie along a perfect straight line, and you will notice that you had to make a guess as to where to draw your line. One simple way to estimate the uncertainty in the value of Ho is to draw the steepest reasonable line and the shallowest reasonable line on the graph, and measure their slopes. Half of the difference between these two slopes is your uncertainty in Ho.
  3. And now for the age of the universe!: If the universe has been expanding since its beginning at a constant speed, the universe's age would simply be 1/Ho.
  4. First, convert Ho to inverse-seconds (1/sec) by cancelling out the distance units: 1 Mpc = 3.09*1019 km.
  5. The "expansion age" of the universe is then t = 1/Ho.
  6. This is a very simple model for the expansion of the universe. A better model would account for the deceleration caused by gravity. Models like this predict the age of the universe to be: t = 2/(3Ho). Re-calculate the age using this relation.
  7. How does this value compare to the age of the Sun?


IV. FURTHER QUESTIONS

Theoretically, your plot should be a straight line, but it probably isn't. Think carefully about the following sources of error and answer the questions below. These three sources of error can be categorized as either "random" or "systematic". Categorize each of them and explain your reasoning. (Note that some of the aforementioned sources of error could be both systematic and random.)

This laboratory was originally developed by the Department of Astronomy at the University of Washington.